Manual wheelchair skills training may be provided to improve manual wheelchair skills in people with SCI.
| Manual wheelchair skills training (v no intervention) on wheelchair skills in people with SCI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | People with SCI | Evidence recommendation Weak for (95%) | Weak evidence recommendation FOR Evidence recommendation: manual wheelchair skills training may be provided to improve manual wheelchair skills in people with SCI. |
||||
| I | Manual wheelchair skills training | ||||||
| C | No intervention | Consensus-based opinion statement No opinion statements |
|||||
| O | Wheelchair skills | ||||||
| SUMMARY | 4 RCTs (see references) | Standardised Mean difference (95% CI): 0.7 (0 to 1.4) Favours wheelchair skills training |
|||||
| GRADE Very low certainty ⨁◯◯◯ | Risk of bias Serious | Inconsistency Very serious | Imprecision Very serious | Indirectness Serious | Publication bias Serious |
||
| MANUAL WHEELCHAIR TRAINING FOR WHEELCHAIR SKILLS: GRADE Evidence to Decision | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROBLEM | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| DESIRABLE EFFECTS | Trivial | Small | Moderate | Large | Don't know | |
| UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS | Large | Moderate | Small | Trivial | Don't know | |
| CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE | Very low | Low | Moderate | High | No included studies | |
| HOW MUCH PEOPLE VALUE THE MAIN OUTCOME | Important uncertainty or variability | Possibly important uncertainty or variability | Probably no important uncertainty or variability | No important uncertainty or variability | ||
| BALANCE OF EFFECTS | Favours the Control | Probably favours the Control | Does not favour either the intervention (I) or the comparison (C) | Probably favours the I | Favours the I | Don't know |
| RESOURCES REQUIRED | Large costs | Moderate costs | Negligible costs and savings | Moderate savings | Large savings | Don't know |
| CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE OF REQUIRED RESOURCES | Very low | Low | Moderate | High | No included studies | |
| COST EFFECTIVENESS | Favours the comparison | Probably favours the comparison | Does not favour either the intervention or the comparison | Probably favours the intervention | Favours the intervention | No included studies |
| EQUITY | Reduced | Probably reduced | Probably no impact | Probably increased | Increased | Don't know |
| ACCEPTABILITY | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| FEASIBILITY | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| MANUAL WHEELCHAIR SKILLS TRAINING FOR WHEELCHAIR SKILLS: Randomised Controlled Trial Details | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STUDY | COMPARISON | DOSAGE/DETAILS | PARTICIPANTS | N (Rx/C) | OUTCOME | ROB 2 PEDRo |
| KIRBY 2016 | Wheelchair skills training V Educational Control | Intervention: Five individual training sessions Control: Five education sessions | People with SCI living in community | 47/49 | Wheelchair skills test | Some concerns about Risk of Bias PEDro = 7/10 |
| RICE 2013 | Wheelchair skills training V No Intervention | 3 visits of real time feedback from a Smart wheel while pushing | People with SCI living in community SCI<2 years | 6/9 | Stroke frequency | Some concerns about Risk of Bias PEDro = 4/10 |
| WOROBEY 2016 | Wheelchair skills training V Control | Between 2-8, 60–80-minute group training sessions | People with SCI living in community | 36/43 | Wheelchair skills test | High Risk of Bias PEDro = 7 |
| YEO 2018 | Wheelchair skills training V No Intervention | 1 hour per day, 3 days/week for 8 weeks | People with tetraplegia living in community | 13/11 | Wheelchair skills test | Some concerns about Risk of Bias PEDro = 4 |
The Australian and NZ SCI Physiotherapy guideline committee recommends manual wheelchair skills training to improve manual wheelchair skills in people with SCI. This is an evidence recommendation supported by the results of four randomised controlled trials. The guideline states:
Manual wheelchair skills training may be provided to improve manual wheelchair skills in people with SCI.
This recommendation was formed by considering the results of four randomised controlled trials alongside other factors. The combined trial results indicate that manual wheelchair skills training is better than no manual wheelchair skills training to improve manual wheelchair skills. The other factors that were considered were benefits and harms, values and preferences, resource use, equity, accessibility, and feasibility.
This is an evidence-based recommendation. Evidence-based recommendations are more robust than consensus-based opinion statements. They can be strong or weak. This is a weak evidence-based recommendation which means the guideline panel is confident that they can probably recommend manual wheelchair skills training to improve manual wheelchair skills in people with SCI. To learn more about this recommendation go to the research summary.
-
Kirby RL, Mitchell D, Sabharwal S, et al. Manual wheelchair skills training for community-dwelling veterans with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2016 Dec;11(12):e0168330.
-
Rice LA, Smith I, Kelleher AR, et al. Impact of the clinical practice guideline for preservation of upper limb function on transfer skills of persons with acute spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013 Jul;94(7):1230-1246.
-
Yeo SS, Kwon JW. Wheelchair Skills Training for Functional Activity in Adults with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. International journal of sports medicine 2018; 39: 924-928.
-
Worobey LA, Kirby RL, Heinemann AW et al Effectiveness of Group Wheelchair Skills Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1777-1784.