Strength training may be provided to improve voluntary strength of partially paralysed muscles in people with SCI.
| Strength training (v no intervention) on voluntary strength of partially paralysed muscles in people with SCI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | People with SCI (partially-paralysed muscles) | Evidence recommendation Weak for (90%) | Weak evidence recommendation FOR Strength training may be provided to improve voluntary strength of partially paralysed muscles in people with SCI. |
||||
| I | Strength training | ||||||
| C | No intervention | Consensus-based opinion statement No opinion statements |
|||||
| O | Voluntary strength | ||||||
| SUMMARY | 3 RCTs (see references) | Standardised Mean Difference (95% CI): 0.4 (0 to 0.9) Favours strength training |
|||||
| GRADE Very low certainty ⨁◯◯◯ | Risk of bias Serious | Inconsistency Very serious | Imprecision Serious | Indirectness Serious | Publication bias Serious |
||
| STRENGTH TRAINING ON VOLUNTARY STRENGTH PARTIALLY PARALYSED MUSCLES: GRADE Evidence to Decision | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROBLEM | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| DESIRABLE EFFECTS | Trivial | Small | Moderate | Large | Don't know | |
| UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS | Large | Moderate | Small | Trivial | Don't know | |
| CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE | Very low | Low | Moderate | High | No included studies | |
| HOW MUCH PEOPLE VALUE THE MAIN OUTCOME | Important uncertainty or variability | Possibly important uncertainty or variability | Probably no important uncertainty or variability | No important uncertainty or variability | ||
| BALANCE OF EFFECTS | Favours the Control | Probably favours the Control | Does not favour either the intervention (I) or the comparison (C) | Probably favours the I | Favours the I | Don't know |
| RESOURCES REQUIRED | Large costs | Moderate costs | Negligible costs and savings | Moderate savings | Large savings | Don't know |
| CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE OF REQUIRED RESOURCES | Very low | Low | Moderate | High | No included studies | |
| COST EFFECTIVENESS | Favours the comparison | Probably favours the comparison | Does not favour either the intervention or the comparison | Probably favours the intervention | Favours the intervention | No included studies |
| EQUITY | Reduced | Probably reduced | Probably no impact | Probably increased | Increased | Don't know |
| ACCEPTABILITY | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| FEASIBILITY | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| STRENGTH TRAINING ON VOLUNTARY STRENGTH PARTIALLY PARALYSED MUSCLES: Randomised Controlled Trial Details | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STUDY | COMPARISON | DOSAGE/DETAILS | PARTICIPANTS | N (Rx/C) | OUTCOME | ROB 2 PEDRo |
| BYE 2017 | Strength training V No intervention | 4 sets of 10RM, 3 x per week for 12 weeks | C1-S5 SCI | 30/30 | Maximal voluntary isometric strength in Nm | Some Concerns of Risk of Bias PEDro = 8/10 |
| CHEN 2020 | Strength training V No intervention | 200 contraction per day, 6 days per week for 6 weeks | C1-S5 SCI | 58/59 | Strength manual muscle test | Some Concerns of Risk of Bias PEDro = 8/10 |
| GLINSKY 2008 | Strength training V No intervention | 3 sets of 10RM, 3 x per week for 8 weeks | C4-C7 tetraplegia | 15/16 | Strength in Nm | Some Concerns of Risk of Bias PEDro = 8/10 |
The Australian and NZ SCI Physiotherapy guideline committee recommends strength training to improve voluntary strength of partially paralysed muscles in people with SCI. This is an evidence recommendation supported by the results of three randomised controlled trials. The guideline states:
Strength training may be provided to improve voluntary strength of partially paralysed muscles in people with SCI.
This recommendation was formed by considering the results of three randomised controlled trials alongside other factors. The trial results indicate that strength training is better than no strength training to improve muscle strength in partially paralysed muscles. The other factors that were considered were benefits and harms, values and preferences, resource use, equity, accessibility, and feasibility.
This is an evidence-based recommendation. Evidence-based recommendations are more robust than consensus-based opinion statements. They can be strong or weak. This is a weak evidence-based recommendation which means the guideline panel is confident that they can probably recommend strength training to improve voluntary strength of partially paralysed muscles in people with SCI based on evidence.
To learn more about this recommendation go to the research summary.
-
Bye EA, Harvey LA, Gambhir A, et al. Strength training for partially paralysed muscles in people with recent spinal cord injury: a within-participant randomised controlled trial. Spinal Cord 2017 May;55(5):460-465.
-
Chen LW et al. effects of 10,000 voluntary contractions over 8 weeks on the strength of very weak muscles in people with spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial. Spinal cord 2020.
-
Glinsky J, Harvey L, Korten M, et al. Short-term progressive resistance exercise may not be effective at increasing wrist strength in people with tetraplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2008;54(2):103-108 2008.