Strength training (v no intervention) on voluntary strength of non-paralysed muscles in people with SCI
Strength training may be provided to improve voluntary strength of non-paralysed muscles in people with SCI.
| Strength training (v no intervention) on voluntary strength of non-paralysed muscles in people with SCI |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | People with SCI (non- paralysed muscles) | Evidence recommendation Weak for (91%) | Weak evidence recommendation FOR Strength training may be provided to improve voluntary strength of non-paralysed muscles in people with SCI. |
||||
| I | Strength training | ||||||
| C | No intervention | Consensus-based opinion statement No opinion statements |
|||||
| O | Voluntary strength | ||||||
| SUMMARY | 3 RCTs (see references) | Consider studies independently. Unable to pool I2 = 78% |
|||||
| GRADE Very low certainty ⨁◯◯◯ | Risk of bias Very serious | Inconsistency Very serious | Imprecision Serious | Indirectness No serious | Publication bias Serious |
||
| STRENGTH TRAINING ON VOLUNTARY STRENGTH INNERVATED MUSCLES: GRADE Evidence to Decision | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROBLEM | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| DESIRABLE EFFECTS | Trivial | Small | Moderate | Large | Don't know | |
| UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS | Large | Moderate | Small | Trivial | Don't know | |
| CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE | Very low | Low | Moderate | High | No included studies | |
| HOW MUCH PEOPLE VALUE THE MAIN OUTCOME | Important uncertainty or variability | Possibly important uncertainty or variability | Probably no important uncertainty or variability | No important uncertainty or variability | ||
| BALANCE OF EFFECTS | Favours the Control | Probably favours the Control | Does not favour either the intervention (I) or the comparison (C) | Probably favours the I | Favours the I | Don't know |
| RESOURCES REQUIRED | Large costs | Moderate costs | Negligible costs and savings | Moderate savings | Large savings | Don't know |
| CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE OF REQUIRED RESOURCES | Very low | Low | Moderate | High | No included studies | |
| COST EFFECTIVENESS | Favours the comparison | Probably favours the comparison | Does not favour either the intervention or the comparison | Probably favours the intervention | Favours the intervention | No included studies |
| EQUITY | Reduced | Probably reduced | Probably no impact | Probably increased | Increased | Don't know |
| ACCEPTABILITY | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| FEASIBILITY | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| STRENGTH TRAINING ON VOLUNTARY STRENGTH INNERVATED MUSCLES: Randomised Controlled Trial Details | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STUDY | COMPARISON | DOSAGE/DETAILS | PARTICIPANTS | N (Rx/C) | OUTCOME | ROB 2 PEDRo |
| HICKS 2003 | Circuit training (Pushing, arm ergometry and PRE) V Education | Supervised progressive exercise 2 x weekly for 9 months. Each session 90-120 minutes | C4-L2 SCI | 11/12 | Elbow flexion strength in kg | High Risk of Bias PEDro = 5/10 |
| MULROY 2011 | Home-based shoulder exercise programme V Education | 3 x per week for 12 weeks | T2 to T7 SCI | 26/32 | Shoulder abduction in Nm | High Risk of Bias PEDro = 7/10 |
| YILDRIM 2016 | Strength training V No intervention | Upper extremity training 5 x per week for 6 weeks | Paraplegia | 13/13 | Elbow flexion Nm/kg | Some Concerns of Risk of Bias PEDro = 4/10 |
The Australian and NZ SCI Physiotherapy guideline committee recommends strength training to improve voluntary strength of non-paralysed muscles in people with SCI. This is an evidence recommendation supported by the results of three randomised controlled trials. The guideline states:
Strength training may be provided to improve voluntary strength of non-paralysed muscles in people with SCI.
This recommendation was formed by considering the results of three randomised controlled trials alongside other factors. The trial results indicate that strength training is better than no strength training to improve muscle strength in non-paralysed muscles. The other factors that were considered were benefits and harms, values and preferences, resource use, equity, accessibility, and feasibility.
This is an evidence-based recommendation. Evidence-based recommendations are more robust than consensus-based opinion statements. They can be strong or weak. This is a weak evidence-based recommendation which means the guideline panel is confident that they can probably recommend strength training to improve voluntary strength of non-paralysed muscles in people with SCI based on evidence.
To learn more about this recommendation go to the research summary.
-
Mulroy SJ, Thompson L, Kemp B, et al. Strengthening and optimal movements for painful shoulders (STOMPS) in chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Physical therapy 2011; 91: 305-324.
-
Hicks Al, Martin KA, Ditor DS, et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal cord 2003; 41: 34.
-
Yildirim A, Sürücü GD, Karamercan A et al Short-term effects of upper extremity circuit resistance training on muscle strength and functional independence in patients with paraplegia. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Nov 21;29(4):817-823.