Massage therapy may be provided to treat pain in people with SCI.
| Massage (v no intervention) on pain in people with SCI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | People with SCI | Evidence recommendation No evidence recommendation Reason: No recommendation due to insufficient or inconclusive evidence. | Weak opinion statement FOR Massage therapy may be provided to treat pain in people with SCI. |
||||
| I | Massage therapy | ||||||
| C | No intervention | Consensus-based opinion statement Weak for (96%) |
|||||
| O | Pain | ||||||
| SUMMARY | 2 RCTs | Mean difference (95% CI) 0.1 (-0.4 to 0.5) Favours no intervention |
|||||
| GRADE Very low certainty ⨁◯◯◯ | Risk of bias Very serious | Inconsistency No serious | Imprecision Serious | Indirectness Serious | Publication bias Serious |
||
| MASSAGE ON PAIN: GRADE Evidence to Decision | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROBLEM | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| DESIRABLE EFFECTS | Trivial | Small | Moderate | Large | Don't know | |
| UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS | Large | Moderate | Small | Trivial | Don't know | |
| CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE | Very low | Low | Moderate | High | No included studies | |
| HOW MUCH PEOPLE VALUE THE MAIN OUTCOME | Important uncertainty or variability | Possibly important uncertainty or variability | Probably no important uncertainty or variability | No important uncertainty or variability | ||
| BALANCE OF EFFECTS | Favours the Control | Probably favours the Control | Does not favour either the intervention (I) or the comparison (C) | Probably favours the I | Favours the I | Don't know |
| RESOURCES REQUIRED | Large costs | Moderate costs | Negligible costs and savings | Moderate savings | Large savings | Don't know |
| CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE OF REQUIRED RESOURCES | Very low | Low | Moderate | High | No included studies | |
| COST EFFECTIVENESS | Favours the comparison | Probably favours the comparison | Does not favour either the intervention or the comparison | Probably favours the intervention | Favours the intervention | No included studies |
| EQUITY | Reduced | Probably reduced | Probably no impact | Probably increased | Increased | Don't know |
| ACCEPTABILITY | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| FEASIBILITY | No | Probably no | Probably yes | Yes | Don't know | |
| MASSAGE ON PAIN: Randomised Controlled Trial Details | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STUDY | COMPARISON | DOSAGE/DETAILS | PARTICIPANTS | N (Rx/C) | OUTCOME | ROB 2 PEDRo |
| CHASE 2013 | Massage V No intervention | Six 20 min massage sessions over 2 weeks | People with complete and incomplete SCI | 20/20 | Shortform McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) | High Risk of Bias PEDro = 5/10 |
| LOVAS 2017 | Massage V Guided imagery relaxation | 1 x per week (30 mins) for 5 weeks | People with complete and incomplete SCI | 20/20 | Intensity on the Brief Pain Inventory | High Risk of Bias PEDro = 4/10 |
The Australian and NZ SCI Physiotherapy guideline committee recommends massage therapy to treat pain in people with SCI.
This is a consensus-based opinion statement supported by the opinions of the experts even though there is one randomised controlled trial related to this topic. However, the result of this randomised controlled trial is inconclusive preventing an evidence recommendation. The guideline states:
Massage therapy may be provided to treat pain in people with SCI.
This statement was formed by considering the opinions of the experts alongside other factors. The other factors that were considered were benefits and harms, values and preferences, resource use, equity, accessibility, and feasibility. The results of one randomised controlled trial was also taken into consideration. This is a consensus-based opinion statement. Consensus-based opinion statements are less robust than evidence-based recommendations. They can be strong or weak.
This is a strong consensus-based opinion statement which means that the guideline panel is confident they can probably recommend massage therapy may be provided to treat pain in people with SCI based on opinion.
To learn more about the research related to this intervention go to the research summary.
-
Chase T, Jha A, Brooks CA, et al. A pilot feasibility study of massage to reduce pain in people with spinal cord injury during acute rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 2013 Nov;51(11):847-851.
-
Lovas J, Tran Y, Middleton J, Bartrop R, Moore N, Craig A. Managing pain and fatigue in people with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial feasibility study examining the efficacy of massage therapy. Spinal Cord 2017; 55: 162-166.